The Consumer Response to a Year of Low Gas Prices
Evidence From 1 Million People
In 2015, gas prices in the United States were 25 percent lower than they had been in 2014. The US Energy Information Administration projected that this drop in prices would put roughly $700 back into the pockets of US households. Understanding in detail how big this boost really was, who experienced it, and how people responded has important implications for the economy and policymakers.
This report relies on an anonymized sample of one million Chase customers across 23 states to quantify the impact of lower gas prices in 2015. Middle-income households spent about $480 less on gas in 2015 than in 2014, the equivalent of more than a one percent increase in annual income for 60 percent of households. The drop in gas spending between 2014 and 2015 varied across the country, with lower impacts felt in the West and urban areas of the Northeast. Households had the potential to save $630 at the pump, of which they spent the majority—58 percent—primarily on non-gas goods and services such as restaurants and retail.
Our data, drawn from 57 million Chase regular debit and credit card customers illuminated the effects declining gas prices had across the US. These four findings cover gas spending and savings, who was the most and least impacted and how lower gas prices impacted consumer spending.
Middle-income households spent about $480 less on gas in 2015 than in 2014. Reductions in gas spending were equivalent to a one percent or greater increase in income for 60 percent of households.
Middle-income households experienced a $477 drop in gas spending from 2014 to 2015. This is a significant amount for middle-income individuals, equal to roughly 1 percent of income or more than half a month’s rent or mortgage payment.
60 percent of households—those in the bottom three income quintiles—experienced savings at the pump that were equivalent to at least 1 percent of annual income.
Seventy-two percent of households spent less on gas in 2015 than in 2014, but households in the West and Northeast were impacted the least.
This material is a product of JPMorgan Chase Institute (“JPMCI”) and is provided to you solely for general information purposes. Unless otherwise specifically stated, any views or opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors listed, and may differ from the views and opinions expressed by JPMS’s Research Department or other departments or divisions of JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. This material is not a product of the Research Department of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“JPMS”). Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively J.P. Morgan) do not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. The data relied on for this report are based on past transactions and may not be indicative of future results. The opinion herein should not be construed as an individual recommendation for any particular client and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies for a particular client. This material does not constitute a solicitation or offer in any jurisdiction where such a solicitation is unlawful.
Copyright 2017 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This publication or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan.