Our findings are three-fold:
Finding 1: Across cities, firms with irregular cash flows were more likely to exit and had slower revenue growth.
Finding 2: Firms with erratically timed revenues and expenses were most common among firms with irregular cash flows and most likely to exit, but firms with sporadic revenues had the largest revenue declines.
Finding 3: Firms with limited cash buffers and irregular cash flows were the least likely to survive.
These findings suggest that cash flow patterns may be as important as liquidity and access to capital as determinants of small business survival and growth. In addition, small businesses can face qualitatively different kinds of cash flow challenges. Policymakers, product designers, and other decision makers who support small businesses might be most effective not only by targeting their efforts to these distinct challenges, but also by targeting their efforts to the cities and communities where these specific challenges are most often present.