Travel for Business or Pleasure: Where does your city rank?
Share of Spending by Visitors to the Metro Area
February 4, 2016
City and regional governments spend considerable time promoting their cities to international markets whether for exports of goods or as a tourist destination. Overlooked is the importance of domestic visitors—business travelers, tourists, or day-trippers—who allow a metro area to extend its economic reach. Much as exports enable firms to reach new markets and consumers beyond their immediate surroundings, increasing the number of visitors to a metro area increases the number of potential customers. Visitors are important beyond the traditional tourist-centric sectors such as hotels or restaurants, with purchases extending into retail and entertainment amongst others. Leveraging data from 12.4 billion anonymized credit and debit card transactions in 15 metropolitan areas, the JPMorgan Chase Institute's recently released Profiles of Local Consumer Commerce (PLCC) can help better explain spending by domestic visitors in metropolitan areas.
Across the fifteen metro areas, the average share of spending by nonresidents was 15.6 percent of total consumer spending. The average masks considerable variance across the cities, as shown in the table below. In Phoenix, nonresidents accounted for 23.0 percent of all local consumer commerce spending. This is nearly 17 percentage points higher than the city with the lowest share of spending by nonresidents, Houston, where visitors only accounted for 6.1 percent of spending. Besides Phoenix, other cities at the top of the rankings include San Diego and Seattle.
|Which metro area has the largest share of spending by visitors?|
|Rank||Metro Area||Share of Spending|
|2||San Diego-Carlsbad, CA||21.6%|
|4||San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA||20.5%|
|5||Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA||18.3%|
|6||Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX||18.1%|
|7||Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA||17.4%|
|–||Fifteen City Average||15.6%|
|10||Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL||15.6%|
|13||New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA||9.8%|
|15||Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX||6.1%|
Source: JPMorgan Chase Institute.
Tourism is generally considered to be highly seasonal, with many destinations known for having peak and quiet periods. However, spending by out-of-towners across most cities remains stable throughout the year, as reflected in the fifteen city average.1 Despite this relative stability, two distinct seasonality patterns emerge: (1) across several cities, notably San Diego and Denver, a slight increase in summer months; and (2) for two of the fifteen cities, Phoenix and Miami, a spike in winter months, reflecting the well-known migration to warm weather and so-called "snowbirds." Interestingly, though the pattern is similar for both cities, the level share in Phoenix is considerably higher than that in Miami—in some months higher by 10 percentage points. In the chart below, we show these patterns by plotting the share of spending by visitors in select metro areas between October 2013 and July 2015.
Visitors are only one part of local economies, but in most cities they represent a meaningful percent of local consumer commerce and thus can be an important market for firms looking to expand beyond the immediate residents of their metro area. The JPMorgan Chase Institute's new data series, Profiles of Local Consumer Commerce, enables better tracking of these data within and across metropolitan areas, and is a powerful tool for understanding consumer commerce and devising better policies to enable commerce.
The JPMorgan Chase Institute is committed to delivering data-rich analyses and expert insights for the public good. Our recently released report Profiles of Local Consumer Commerce tells the story of the decline in everyday retail spending across fifteen metro areas. As part of a five week series, the JPMC Institute will explore the differences between the metro areas through a series of blog posts ranking the cities across select dimensions from the report. Last week we looked at Spending at Small and Medium Enterprises.
This material is a product of JPMorgan Chase Institute (“JPMCI”) and is provided to you solely for general information purposes. Unless otherwise specifically stated, any views or opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors listed, and may differ from the views and opinions expressed by JPMS’s Research Department or other departments or divisions of JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. This material is not a product of the Research Department of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“JPMS”). Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively J.P. Morgan) do not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. The data relied on for this report are based on past transactions and may not be indicative of future results. The opinion herein should not be construed as an individual recommendation for any particular client and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies for a particular client. This material does not constitute a solicitation or offer in any jurisdiction where such a solicitation is unlawful.
Copyright 2017 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This publication or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan.